Models and prototypes
Development hardware in the flight alloy, so the test article is the real thing.
What additive manufacturing for metals actually is, which processes exist, where laser powder bed fusion fits, and how a Huntsville shop uses it to build hardware for NASA programs.
AME was incorporated in 2018 to do one thing: metal additive manufacturing for customers who need parts that conventional processes cannot make. This page is the primer we wish every first time customer had read before sending a file.
Additive manufacturing is the industrial term for 3D printing. ISO/ASTM 52900 defines it as joining materials to make parts from 3D model data, usually layer upon layer, as opposed to subtractive manufacturing (machining) and formative manufacturing (casting, forging, moulding). Metal additive manufacturing applies that idea to engineering alloys: nickel superalloys, copper alloys, titanium, aluminium, steels.
The consequence is that geometry becomes almost free. Internal channels, lattices, thin walls and consolidated assemblies cost nothing extra to print, while they may be impossible to machine or cast. What you pay for instead is machine time, powder and post processing.
The standard groups additive processes into seven categories. Five of them are used for metal in production today.
We chose LPBF because the hardware our customers bring us is small enough to fit a 400 mm cube, complicated enough to need 40 micron layers and loaded hard enough to need full density. See how laser powder bed fusion works for the step by step.
Metal additive manufacturing is the wrong answer often enough that we say so. Simple geometry at volume is cheaper machined or cast. A part larger than the envelope has to be split or made another way. As built surfaces are rougher than machined ones, so sealing faces and bearing fits get finished afterwards. And every printed part carries residual stress until it is heat treated, which is a process step, not an option.
We qualify and run two alloys that propulsion programs fly: Inconel 718, the nickel superalloy for hot structural hardware, and GRCop-42, NASA’s copper chromium niobium alloy for combustion chamber liners and anything else that has to move heat. Other alloys that run on the EOS M 400 platform can be brought on for programs with the volume to justify a dedicated powder lot.
Flight hardware needs more than a good looking part. The specifications below are the ones customers ask us about most.
We hold parameters, powder lots and build records for every job, put witness coupons on the plate when the program calls for them, and coordinate HIP, heat treatment and testing with partners who work to the same standards.
Huntsville is one of the places where metal additive manufacturing grew up. Marshall Space Flight Center matured and hot fire tested the GRCop alloys, and the engine programs on and around Redstone Arsenal print combustion devices as routine practice. AME sits a few miles from both. Our chief engineer built a GRCop-42 fuel injector with NASA and Marshall that we showed at RAPID + TCT, and the team has 35 combined years in additive. More on the shop and where we serve.
Development hardware in the flight alloy, so the test article is the real thing.
Repeat runs on locked parameters for aerospace, defense, medical and automotive programs.
Cooling channels, lattices, consolidated assemblies and thin walls that no cutter can reach.
Yes. Additive manufacturing is the term used in standards and in industry, 3D printing the everyday one. Metal additive manufacturing and metal 3D printing describe the same processes.
After heat treatment, laser powder bed fusion parts in Inconel 718 meet or exceed the minimum tensile properties of the wrought specifications. As built density is typically above 99.5 percent, and hot isostatic pressing closes what porosity remains.
Nickel superalloys (718, 625), copper alloys (GRCop-42, CuCrZr), titanium (Ti-6Al-4V), aluminium (AlSi10Mg), stainless and tool steels (316L, 17-4 PH), cobalt chrome and more. AME runs Inconel 718 and GRCop-42, and can add alloys for programs with the volume to justify a dedicated powder lot.
Up to 400 × 400 × 400 mm in one piece on the EOS M 400. Larger assemblies are printed in sections and joined.
Per part, usually more than machining a simple shape and less than tooling up a casting for a few pieces. It wins on complex geometry, low volumes and speed. Our cost guide explains what moves the number.
Yes, with a qualified process and the testing the program requires. NASA-STD-6030 and the ASTM and AMS specifications define the path, and we build to it.
What the job includes, the specifications, and how to choose a shop.
ProcessHow the machine works, the design rules, and LPBF next to powder metallurgy.
MaterialComposition, properties, heat treatment and ASTM F3055.
MaterialNASA’s copper alloy for chamber liners and injectors.
PricingSix cost drivers, typical ranges, and how to bring the number down.
LocationNext to Redstone Arsenal and Marshall. Visit the shop.
Request a quote
Send the model and the material. If it can be built, we will tell you what it costs and how long it takes.